Ever since protests broke out in Lhasa on March 14, the Dalai Lama’s ‘middle path policy’ has been criticised by many as being politically naïve and ineffective. It has been suggested that non-violence as a weapon of dissent cannot work against a totalitarian regime, that nobody in China is moved by his “appeals to their conscience”, even that he must stick to spirituality and leave politics to others better suited to its demands.
So, what are the demands of politics in our times? Ideology that appeals to narrow self-identities, cynicism that allows for the manipulation of people and systems, a way with words that might be persuasive but lacks sincerity, a posse of skilled spin doctors, deep pockets, and so on? Surely there is space in our world, not to mention a crying need, for a politician of a different sort. A spiritual politician in the tradition of the Platonic ‘philosopher-king’, who is motivated not by personal ambition but by the wish to serve. In the 14th Dalai Lama, this ideal is a living reality.
Take, for instance, his refusal to hate the enemy or resort to a divisive rhetoric. While stating the facts about the repression of Tibet and standing by his beleaguered people, the Dalai Lama has tried to keep channels of communication with the Chinese government open. At a teaching in New Delhi in the last week of March, when every day brought fresh news of the brutal crackdown in Tibet, the Dalai Lama said, “Every evening, I give and take. I take all the hatred and negativity the Chinese direct towards me. And I give back compassion, loving kindness and peace to them.”
This perspective and its relentless daily practice is rooted in the Buddhist understanding of the mind as a dynamic process, as opposed to a fixed thing, which can be transformed through awareness and cultivation of positive mind-states. One may not be able to change one’s circumstances, but one can ensure one is equipped with a calm and compassionate mind to handle them.
To arrive at the truth, the Dalai Lama says he uses the Buddhist approach of eschewing extremes and examining an issue from multiple perspectives – a strategy that pre-empts rigid positions. Hence he is able to accommodate the other and see from standpoints other than his own, which has led to openness to dialogue and compromise in the worst situations.
Non-harming is crucial to the Buddhist worldview that sees reality as a chain of interconnected phenomena. Ends, therefore, cannot justify the means, it’s actually the means – how you make the journey – that justifies the ends. If you do get independence, and it comes because you have harmed the other, you have already lost what you were fighting for.
Those who feel the Dalai Lama’s non-violence has failed to save Tibet must ask, ‘What is the Tibet we are trying to save?’ Is it a geographical area, or is it also a unique civilisation? The Dalai Lama may have failed to liberate the former, but he has undeniably saved the latter.
At one level, his policy of non-violent resistance has prevented a holocaust in Tibet. At another, it is an affirmation of the ideals of Buddhism that are inextricably intertwined with Tibetan culture and identity. The Dalai Lama has wrested Tibetan civilization from spiritual decline by challenging it to practise its ancient ideals in the here and now. Just as Mahatma Gandhi inspired India to live up to her civilizational values of satya (the pursuit of truth) and ahimsa (non-harming), and turn them into practicable means to an ethical end.
Yet, Gandhi did not wish India to return to some glorified past. He was impatient with aspects of tradition that were unjust and disconnected from modern humanism, like untouchability, caste and communal divides, women’s subjugation, and worked tirelessly to weed them out. The Dalai Lama, too, is a modern mind committed to positive change through social innovation. He has ensured the Tibetan government-in-exile is democratically elected, and has made it clear that feudal Tibet is history. He admires Marxism for its stress on economic equality, is ecologically aware, keenly engages with the sciences, and has ensured modern education for exiled Tibetans.
At a deeper level, the Dalai Lama has encouraged his people to develop a strong ethical core. To retaliate with guns and grenades is easy; to choose non-violence by connecting with an inclusive compassion, and viewing life as not shaded by likes and dislikes but as a whole, requires far greater courage. Which is perhaps why the Indic wisdom traditions accorded the greatest respect to those who conquered their inner demons, who raised themselves out of narrow identities to a realisation of universal oneness, rather than those who conquered lands and peoples.
Not so long ago, we the people of India threw in our lot with a frail man in a loin-cloth because we were moved by his inner strength. Today, in a world where violence and weapons outweigh dialogue and reconciliation as responses to conflict, the Dalai Lama and his six million people have revived the spirit of Gandhi, just as the Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr., and the Anti-Apartheid struggle symbolised by Nelson Mandela, did.
Does today’s India have the spiritual strength to support this new experiment with truth?
[If you agree with the position articulated in this post, please visit this online petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/indtib35/petition.html]
A Relentless Pursuit
The ongoing controversy about the Karmapa being played out in all sections of the Indian media seems to me symptomatic of a relentless, and at times mindless, pursuit of ‘scoops’.
Have any of those making dark insinuations about the Karmapa’s Chinese links considered the following:
1. Lay Tibetans traditionally offer money to their lamas when they visit them. This was a way of the laity participating in the upkeep of monasteries and nunneries, and monks and nuns who were not actively engaged in the job of earning a living. The Karmapa appears to have a following in, among other places, Taiwan and mainland China. Tibetans from inside Tibet too try and visit Dharamsala to meet His Holiness the Dalai Lama and the Karmapa. The currency they have is the Yuan.
2. Why is there no mention of the fact that the present Karmapa has a rival because of the complex nature of recognising reincarnates in Tibetan Buddhism?
3. The present Karmapa has widely been seen as a ‘successor’ to the Dalai Lama’s role as an important leader of the international Tibetan movement for autonomy. His Holiness the Dalai Lama has been grooming and guiding him for such a possible role in the future. The government of the People’s Republic of China would like for him to emerge as a tainted figure, something they have tried to do quite unsuccessfully with His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
Obviously, the issue is a complicated one, and I have no intention of supporting any illegality. But I do feel the media in India should try and analyse all available facts, and the complexities involved, before casting aspersions that can be potentially damaging not just to an individual but an entire community and its struggle.
1 Comment
Filed under Comment, Curent Affairs, News
Tagged as Controversy, India, Karmapa